|
|
|
A¡L¡nc£u¡ 22Ân nË¡hZ, 1410 |
|
RABINDRANATH TAGORE AND THE SPIRIT OF FREEDOM Sudeb Mitra |
||
|
|
||
|
Ezra
Pound once wrote, "Rabindranath Tagore sang Bengal into a
nation." That remark was certainly not an exaggeration, since
Tagore's songs and poetry had a great impact on the revolutionaries of
Bengal who were fighting against British imperialism. There is a story
about the Bengali revolutionary Ullashkar Dutta, who was sentenced to
death by the British government. It is reported that, "One day when
the prisoners were assembled in the court room some time before the
judge was due, one of them began to sing a patriotic song - sharthok
jawnomo amar jonmechi ei deshey - `Blessed am I that I am born
to this land, And that I had the luck to love her.' It is reported that
there was a pin-drop silence when this song was being sung in a
melodious tune, with a feeling of pathos natural to one who was perhaps
going to close his eyes very soon for serving his motherland. The
lawyers, visitors and even the menials who crowded the room, listened
with rapt attention, with tears owing from their eyes
and nobody thought of stopping the young man, almost a boy, who poured
out the inmost thought and desire of his mind in a melodious
strain." James
Campbell Ker, I. C. S., wrote in his `Political trouble in India,
1907-1917': The place of honour in the first number is given to a poem
entitled Suprobhaat by the celebrated poet Rabindranath Tagore,
the leading idea of which is: Tagore's
poems and songs played an important role in the liberation movement of
Bangladesh, which began with the historic Language Movement in 1952, when the people of East
Pakistan protested against the imposition of Urdu as a national
language. Tagore's songs were banned in Pakistan in 1965 during the
dictatorship of Ayub Khan and a wave of cultural fundamentalism. Several
intellectuals also joined this tirade against Tagore - their fantastic
argument was that Tagore was a "Hindu poet" and therefore
alien to a predominantly Muslim country. That was actually a great
irony, since Tagore had a lifelong interest in Urdu literature. The
famous Urdu writer and communist activist Sajjad Zaheer wrote that
"the best Urdu writers were very much influenced by his writings
and that he was the supreme guru of us all." In
July 1971, at the height of Pakistan's genocide in East Pakistan, a 24-year-old
economics student was brought to a torture chamber in Dhaka cantonment.
When he was being brutally tortured by the Pakistani soldiers, he sang Amar
shonar Bangla, Ami tomay bhalobashi - "I love you dearly, My
golden Bengal." His name was Iqbal Ahmed who later became a popular
singer in Bangladesh. That famous song is now the national anthem of
that country. Tagore is perhaps the only poet to have authored the
national anthems of two different countries - Bangladesh and India. Tagore's
impact was certainly not confined to Bengal. He had a direct influence
on many revolutionaries from different parts of the world. The famous
Polish educational thinker and activist Janusz Korczak produced Tagore's
famous play Dakghar, "The Post Office" with the children of
the orphanage in the Warsaw ghetto. Two months later, Korczak and the
children were taken away and gassed in Treblinka. When asked why he
chose to stage "The Post Office," Korczak's response was,
"because eventually one had to learn to accept serenely the angel
of death." Susan
Owen, mother of the famous British poet Wilfred Owen, wrote the
following letter to Tagore (in 1920), Also
worth recalling, is the story of the Indonesian communist Njoto. After
the 1965 military coup in Indonesia that brought to power the brutal
dictator Suharto, Njoto was given the death sentence by a military
court. His last words in the court room were two lines of a famous
Tagore song: In
1970, during the `Afro-Asian Writers Conference' held in India, a
representative from Vietnam condemned the US aggression by reciting the
following words from a poem of Tagore (titled "Africa"): Rabindranath
opposed all forms of colonial rule and imperial domination. He strongly
opposed the British proposal in 1905 to divide Bengal into two provinces
and wrote several memorable songs on that occasion. After the 1919
Amritsar massacre (when the British army opened fire on a peaceful
crowd, and more than 350 unarmed people were killed and thousands were
wounded), he returned his knighthood as a form of protest. He wrote to
the Viceroy of India, "I for my part want to stand, shorn of all
special distinctions, by the side of those of my countrymen who for
their so-called insignificance are liable to suffer a degradation not
fit for human beings." In 1931, when two political prisoners were
killed and several others were wounded in the Hijli prison (in India),
Tagore strongly protested and gave a stirring speech at a gathering in
Calcutta, condemning the police brutality. He was consistently critical
of British imperialism. However, he also warned against any national
one-sidedness. He wrote, "Patriotism cannot be our final spiritual
shelter; my refuge is humanity. I will not buy glass for the price of
diamond, and I will never allow patriotism to triumph over humanity as
long as I live." Tagore's
lectures on "Nationalism" influenced many Western thinkers and
activists. He said "Neither the colourless vagueness of
cosmopolitanism, nor the fierce self-idolatry of nation-worship is the
goal of human history." A young British soldier Max Plowman joined
the War in 1914, but after reading Rabindranath's
"Nationalism" his life radically changed - he became an
anti-war activist. In 1921, Lenin requested the famous Indian
revolutionary Abdur Peshawari to suggest him a list of books related to
India's freedom movement. Peshawari gave Lenin a list of 37 books that
included some books of Tagore. It is said that Lenin read Tagore's
lectures on "Nationalism" in German translation. Tagore's
anti-imperialist ideas were much admired by Lenin, Krupskaya, Maxim
Gorky, Lunarcharsky, the famous French communist writer Henri Barbausse,
Pablo Neruda (who also translated some of his poems in Spanish), and
Bertolt Brecht. While visiting Vienna in 1926, Tagore met the famous
communist Angelica Balabano. They had an interesting conversation on
Mussolini and Fascism; this is recorded in Balabano's autobiography
"My life as a rebel." In
December 1939, Rabindranath wrote to his friend Leonard Elmhirst,
"It does not need a defeatist to feel deeply anxious about the
future of millions who with all their innate culture and their peaceful
traditions are being simultaneously subjected to hunger,disease,
exploitations foreign and indigeneous, and the seething discontents of
communalism." Tagore did not live to see the ultimate outburst of
communal frenzy during the 1946 Hindu-Muslim riots, and the subsequent
partition of India, based on religious separatism. However, his words to
Elmhirst prophetically captured some of the burning problems that the
entire Indian subcontinent is facing today. Poverty, illiteracy, the
destructive results of capitalist globalization, and a wave of religious
fundamentalism are now devastating the social fabric of South Asia. He
would have strongly opposed the idea of seeing India exclusively along
"Hindu" lines. Towards the end of one of his classic novels,
the central character, Gora, remarks, "within me there is no
conflict between communities, whether Hindu or Muslim or Christian"
and he yearns to learn "the mantra of that deity who belongs to all
- Hindu, Muslim, Christian, Brahmo - the doors of whose temple are never
closed to any person of any caste or race - the deity not only of Hindus
but of Bharatvarsha." Tagore steadfastly opposed all forms of
exclusivism, narrow sectarianism, and cultural separatism. His emphasis
on the lack of education as a main cause of many of India's social
problems, remains extremely relevant today (throughout South
Asia). According to him, "the imposing tower of misery which today
rests on the heart of India has its sole foundation in the absence of
education. Caste divisions, religious conflicts, aversion to work,
precarious economic conditions - all centre on this single factor." A
central aspect of Tagore's thinking was "freedom of mind". The
eminent economist and philosopher Amartya Sen notes, "For Tagore it
was of the highest importance that people be able to live, and reason,
in freedom." This captures the essence of Tagore's approach to
education, politics, and culture. He would have definitely agreed with
the Enlightenment idea that "education is not to be viewed as
something like filling a vessel with water but, rather, assisting a
flower to grow in its own way," so eloquently expressed by Noam
Chomsky. He worked tirelessly to put in practice his humanistic ideas on
education in his school at Santiniketan. He thought much and wrote
extensively on education. In this context, it is important to recall his
views on the Soviet Union. He was greatly impressed by the Soviet
government's commitment to spread basic education to all people. He
wrote, "In stepping on the soil of Russia, the first thing that
caught my eye was that in education, at any rate, the peasant and the
working classes have made such enormous progress in these few years that
nothing comparable has happened even to our highest classes in the
course of the last hundred and fifty years." However, Tagore did
not fail to see the authoritarian aspects in Soviet society and he was
sharply critical of them. Again, the emphasis was on "freedom of
thought". He said, "I must ask you: are you doing your ideal a
service by arousing in the minds of those under your training anger,
class-hatred, and revengefulness against those whom you consider to be
your enemies? Freedom of mind is needed for the reception of truth;
terror hopelessly kills it . . . For the sake of humanity I hope you may
never create a vicious force of violence, which will go on weaving an
interminable chain of violence and cruelty. . . You have tried to
destroy many of the other evils of the czarist period. Why not try to
destroy this one also?" As we all know, his comradely warnings
turned out to be quite accurate. His emphasis on "freedom of
mind" reminds us of the very sympathetic criticism of the
Bolsheviks by the outstanding libertarian Marxist intellectual and
activist Rosa Luxemburg. She warned (very early) that freedom only for
the supporters of a Party, however numerous they may be, is no freedom
at all, and added, "Freedom is always and exclusively freedom for
the one who thinks differently." I
should add that Tagore was widely read in the Soviet Union and his great
humanist ideas were very much respected. The outstanding Soviet scholar,
P. S. Kogan summarized it well: "It must have seemed that Tagore,
avoiding all political struggle, absorbed in his deep meditation, must
be foreign to us and far away from our life, which is spent in an
atmosphere of stormy political discussions and feverish reconstructions.
But it is an error. A thinker, reflecting on the Eternal, and a
Revolution full of today's interest and immediate problems, are not
enemies. There is no rupture between them, and somewhere high up on the
last summit they will hold a friendly meeting. Our Revolution does not
reject the hope of `a golden age', of a future brotherhood of humanity,
the idea which during many thousand years animated all religions and
also the best representatives of humanity . . . That is why the songs of
Tagore are resounding in our hearts as a beautiful call for
liberation." Rabindranath
Tagore never belonged to any particular school of political thought. He
was a great humanist in the loftiest sense of that word. Nothing,
perhaps, expresses his humanist ideals as clearly as this poem in
Gitanjali: The
best way to remember Tagore, is not to treat him as an icon, or a
"gurudev," or a "mystic from the East," but to be
inspired by his great creative genius, and to strive to inherit from him
the best in him - his moral passion, his tenacity, his amazing ability
to constantly surpass himself, his steadfast belief in the importance of
freedom of thinking, and his unwavering faith in humanity. His voice can
be heard in his own words: References: Acknowledgement. I
want to thank Anandamayee Majumdar for her valuable comments and
suggestions, and also for several translations. |
||
| A¡L¡nc£u¡ |
3u pwMÉ¡, 2003 |
|
| 22Ân nË¡hZ, 1410 | ||